|
London in 1700 |
||||||||||
|
Weekly Paper Assignments
Directions
PAPER #1: Describe the life of a typical Londoner in 1700. Due Monday 8 September. You may decide what gender and class your Londoner was, what their profession was (if they had one) and their cause of death. Though a great proportion of Londoners died in childhood, your's must have reached adulthood for the purposes of this assignment, and they must have married (though you can decided if they liked their marriage or not). You may also find that giving your fictitious Londoner a name makes the wording of your paper easier.
PAPER #2: To what extent were all Londoners engaged in a culture of conspicuous consumption? Due Monday 15 September. You must determine to what extent (i.e., to a great extent, to a very little extent) Londoners of all backgrounds made an effort to acquire goods or participate in activities so that they could be seen doing so. This will require you to separate purchases or activities that were necessary (basic food or attending church, for instance) from those that were beyond the means of the individuals in question. Conspicuous consumption, then, is the practice of living "above your station" or trying to show off to those of your social class in an effort to improve your own social status.
PAPER #3: Compare & contrast the toleration given to two fringe groups in 17th/18th-century London. Due Monday 22 September. You must select two groups on the edges of London society and determine
how similar and different their reception was by mainstream Londoners,
as all were tolerated in some way. Groups to consider are: the poor, migrant
workers (from the country), Huguenots, Jews, Africans, nonconformists
(Quakers, etc.), prostitutes, homosexuals, and criminals. You cannot select
groups from the chapter(s) you lead in class discussion, and all students
should select groups from two different chapters in the book.
Final Paper Assignment Due no later than Noon on Wednesday 24 September. Directions Questions In her Foreward, Maureen Waller describes Londoners in 1700 as "Buoyant, ebullient, optimistic, audacious, violent, brutal, gutsy - they thrust themselves forward demanding to be heard." In what ways is Moll Flanders an accurate representation of Waller's evidence? In what ways is she not?? - OR - Select one topic that features in both the book and the film and compare & contrast Maureen Waller's description of it with that presented in the film. The most obvious topics to select would be marriage or religion or Newgate Prison, but you may select another topic if you wish. - OR - Moll Flanders was intended by Daniel Defoe to be a tool to help reform
wayward Londoners of his day. In your opinion, how effective has he been
with his goal? (Use supporting evidence from your class notes, as well
as material from the film.)
|
|
||||||||||||
|